Approaches to dance education (Whitehead and Akinleye)
Education from the waist up, and
slightly to one side
Whilst
included in the primary school curriculum, physical education within this
setting is often seen as a supplementary and periphery subject. ‘As children
get older we gradually educate them from the waist up, and then we focus on the
brain, and slightly to one side’ (Robinson, 2006). Educating the physical body
is viewed as being of secondary importance and hold less weight or emphasis
than more academic subjects such as maths and literacy. Though many teachers
acknowledge the benefits in terms of health and well-being, that is often where
the value of physical education ends.
Adesola Akinleye begins to unpick some
possible reasons for this, explaining that ‘the body has become medicalised – something to observe
objectively, diagnose, fix and ‘work on’’ (2013)’. Our physical abilities are
merely then something to be harnessed and manipulated in order to achieve the
ambitions and aims of the more important brain, a form of transport. We see
this in that people often do not pay much attention to the body unless it is
lacking in some way, through illness or injury for example. This dualism, often
mirrored in education, views the mind, body and emotions as separately educated
entities of the human experience. Little interplay perhaps takes place within
the primary education curriculum and there is a great bias skewed towards the
former.
As a
result of this philosophy, often less time, emphasis and training is given to delivering
physical education within the primary school setting, with focus instead on
academic and cognitive development. This dualism appears to be rather an unnatural
human state, children are naturally very physically active from an early age, playing
games, climbing over furniture, banging and chewing toys. When we find them
singing, they often naturally dance also and vice versa, interaction and
involvement of the self in the world is holistic. This holistic learning seems
almost to be ‘educated out of us’ as we sit at desk using acute motor movements
with pencil to harness all learning of the brain in one direction. The role of
physical education could therefore be seen to rekindle this interactive
relationship between mind body and emotions.
The body as a primary way of
experiencing the world
Margaret
Whitehead begins to identify a deeper role for the body within physical
education which has significant implications for this area and others in
primary education. She describes
‘Our bodily dimension is integrally involved in most aspects of
our existence-not least in the establishment of a meaningful relation- ship
with the world around us. Taken from this viewpoint our body and its motility
can be seen to have an equal claim for attention in education alongside our
other attributes which give life its meaning’ (1990)
The physical body is the primary way in which our mind and
emotions interacts with the world. As it is heavily involved in our existence
so it potentential to provide us with learning opportunities should be also.
This philosophy finds the body is key veihle for learning from
infancy and into adulthood. Huge attention is paid to a childs early physical
development, charting the first cry, smile, bounce, clap, crawl, stand and
walk. Why should this development of physical motility then suddenly stop or be
fizzles out at some age? If the body is a primary means to learning then
learning that takes place without consideration of the physical element is
surely insufficient and lacking. Likewise movement teaching, whether sport or
dance, should not be absent minded an ambigious but connected with thoughtful
reflection, observance and opinions about own experience and feelings. Both of
these offer a considerable challenge.
Embodied to notice a wealth of self
capacity in rich surroundings
The implication of this philosophy for Whitehead is a need to
foster a greater awareness of both the richness of our surroundings and the
wealth of our capacities as individuals within the world to interact with it.
Dance
or physical education could perhaps be defined as ‘becoming embodied’. Though
we are in our bodies all the time, it is at this moment that the individual is
called to bring awareness to notice their physical self in each given moment,
where it is, what it is doing, why it is doing so, and how this can happen.
This could include spatial relationships of distance and own proprioception,
use of muscle tension, force and reactivity to surroundings. What potetial does
it have beyond the movement means of normal life, which are fairly limited to
walking, arm gestures, sitting and standing. The can educate their bodies to new
potential movement possibilies that they had not previously discovered and then
refine them.
As
part of embodiment, the individual becomes aware of the nature of the
surroundings in which they are situated and their thoughts/feelings towards
them. What do they sense, hear, smell, taste and touch etc.. How will they
react and respond, what can they and will they do with the information they
have. We see this often for example in young children in that when they enter a
big space they immediately want to run around in it, to knock down a tall tower
or hit a balloon in the air. With what inquisitiveness, impulsion or
thoughtfulness will they interact with the space, people and objects around
them.
‘The body holds huge potential for
movement, yet very little of these capabilities are tapped into during every
day life. The aim of physical
education is to develop these embodied faculties to enable pupils to achieve
effective liaison in progressively more complex and demanding situations.’
(Whitehead, 1990)
Akinleye
describes dance as the conversation between these two elements, self in the
world, Within this state the body and mind interact and dialogue with one
another in a reciprocal relationship. All three partner in experiencing, being
valued and listened to and making choices. There is a ‘connection made between
sensation and meaning’ (Akinleye, 2013).
‘The real
value of physical education…lies in the development of a specific mode of
relating to the world, not lived with the usual casual presump-tion, but in
which the mover is acutely aware of the totality of his embodiment in its
reciprocal interaction with the patterns of force and resistance in the world.
(Whitehead, 1990)
Applications to practice?
How
does this then relate to physical education and dance sessions within primary
education, what practical methods and teaching technques can then be used to
translate this priority into practice?
How
can sessions encompass the whole individual, mind, body and emotions?
- What time and space are
children given to explore their own movement choices
- How are they encouraged to
express opinions, preferences, likes and dislikes, and give reasons for these
- How are they encouraged to
solve movement problems using task work
How
can we increase awareness of self, awareness of the world, and conversation
between these two?
- Drawing attention to them
noticing and trying different spaces, times and forces with their bodies and
noticing their potential
- What can they notice about
the space, props or other children around them? How do the want to physically
respond to this?
References
Whitehead,
M. (1990). ‘Meaningful Existence, Embodiment and Physical Education’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24, 1
Akinleye, A. (2013). ‘Health, decolonization
and the language of dance’ Animated,
2013, 2
Robinson,
K. (2006) ‘How schools kill creativity’ TED Talk

1 Comments:
Hi Laura, I feel you made a great summary of some of the things we talked about in terms of finding a position to come from - a 'theoretical stand point' - to come from an embodied perspective and what that means. I see you have quoted my recent Animated article. I have written with more focus on the notion of embodiment in the following
Akinleye, Adesola. (2012). Orientation for Communication: embodiment, and the language of dance. Empedocles: the European journal for the philosophy of communication, 4(2), pp.101-112.
http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journals/view-Article,id=17548/
I'd be interested in what you think.
In terms of your questions I would suggest that we must consider the 'power structures in schools'. From the embodied perspective we create each other and the environment together. To unpick what an embodied approach 'looks like' in school might change the nature of the questions that (to some extent) appear to assume one person (teacher) creating a space for another (student). I suggest this in the spirit of inquiry further into practice. I also totally understand these questions and ask them of myself too.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home